Deniers describe the Holocaust as a myth concocted by Jews to extract sympathy, money, and moral carte blanche; they portray the Holocaust and the Nuremberg Trials as conspiracies to promote Jewish power and influence.
How then to explain the growing Holocaust revisionism movement, spearheaded by the California-based Institute for Historical Reviewfounded by longtime anti-Semite Willis Carto of the Liberty Lobby to deny history's most fully documented atrocity?
Deborah Lipstadt argues in her much-praised that revisionists ["deniers"] should not be debated because there "can not be" another side to the Holocaust story.
[the book] contains photocopies and photographs of hundredsof pages of the trial transcripts and documents accepted as exhibits,allowing the reader to see for himself just how irrational some of theclaims were."
"Collection of Holocaust sources from 'eye witnesses' and otherwise'proven' accounts that are now considered absurd and false.
The Deborah Lipstadtsand there is a clique of them on every campuswork to suppress revisionist research and demand that students and faculty ape their fascist behavior.
“Urgent and unprecedented environmental and social changes challenge scientists to define a new social contract. This contract represents a commitment on the part of all scientists to devote their energies and talents to the most pressing problems of the day, in proportion to their importance, in exchange for public funding.”
This transfers effective politicalcontrol to the lowest elements who will cowtow to the Jews."
Zionist spokesmen often boast of: "The shattering effect of theholocaust on the Christian conscience resulting in a feeling ofcollective indebtedness to the Jews."
Massive unending U.S.
(Updated September 9, 2002)
Sally Rogow, Ed.D. wrote a series of short essays about teenagers who offered resistance against the Nazis. The essays are all based on historical facts. A lesson plan also is included. Dr. Rogow is a docent of the Vancouver Holocaust Education Centre and is a special education teacher (e.g., education of students who are blind, visually impaired and/or multiply disabled).
Thus the more the Press, TV and Hollywood promotes the holocaust themore money the United Jewish Appeal and other Zionist funds can extractfrom gullible people ().
Here are the reasons that have impressed me as particularly persuasive in coming to my own conclusion that the Revisionist view of the Holocaust story is the correct one:
- There is no convincing or substantial evidence for the allegation of mass killings in gas chambers in the wartime German camps.
SPIRITUAL, EDUCATIONAL, AND PHYSICAL
RESISTANCE IN THE WARSAW GHETTO
by Sol A. Factor
Cleveland Heights High School
Cleveland Heights, Ohio
“Sol A. Factor wrote two sets of detailed lesson plans (below) to study the Warsaw Ghetto. The lesson plans focus on how the Holocaust changed the lives of the people and how they responded to the Holocaust. Each set has six lesson plans with the following sections: Purpose, Objectives, Materials, Method and Order of Presentation, and Closure. The high school lesson plans were part of the application that led to his selection in 1998 to become a Mandel Fellow at the US Holocaust Memorial Museum.”
That our presidents, senators and congressmen are all supposed to be convinced that the Germans killed six million Jews, that almost all of our nation's professors and churchmen are said to maintain that the Holocaust is a fact, doesn't make it a fact.
This study guide accompanies Surviving Hatred: Witness To The Holocaust, a 30-minute video designed to teach middle and high school students the lessons of the Holocaust. The video includes a brief history of the Holocaust, followed by the personal testimonies of four survivors who live in Southern Virginia. The study guide includes classroom activities, survivors’ biographies, a Holocaust time line, and annotated bibliographies.
The global warming agenda has nothing to do with science and everything to do with politics and ideology. Nearly 6 decades ago, President Eisenhower in his 1961 farewell address to the nation, in which the president famously warned of the danger to the nation of a growing armaments industry referred to as a “military-industrial complex,” he talked about the risks posed by a scientific-technological elite.