argues that "The international community needs to initiate a wider discussion about both sentencing standards and the crime of terrorism," and he recommends that the international community should "work out some sentencing guidelines first for the crimes currently in place and move toward a clearer statement of the criminalization of terrorism at a later stage." (Posted 12/27/10)Matthew Swift and Nicholas Logothetis of Concordia Partnerships Against Extremism, "discuss their new formula for approaching the issue of terrorism" in the video embedded below: In "The Politics of Punishing Terrorists," Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 24, Number 1, Spring 2010, Anthony F.
(Posted 6/24/09) In "Barbarians and the International Law: Beyond the Gates of Liberty?", a paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th Annual Convention, Bridging Multiple Divides, Hilton San Francisco, CA, March 26, 2008, Daniel Brunstetter examines the place of "barbarians" in Renaissance and Early Modern sources of international legal theory -- from Vitoria to Kant -- as a way of shedding light on the war on terror.
The mechanism of vicarious liability is arguably the
best compromise between the needs of tort victims and the freedom of
businesses as the employer usually has insurance to cover the tort of
the employee, making it more financially viable to the employer than
directly compensating the claimant.
However, recent developments in the law on vicarious liability not
only makes the employer liable for acts that are ‘directly’ connected
with what they are employed to do, but it is now established that an
employer may be liable for the unauthorised acts of an employee, where
those acts are ‘closely connected’ with the nature of the wrongdoer’s
The principle of vicarious liability can also burden the
operation of a business by placing a disproportionate amount of
responsibility on an employer.
1. ‘Recent decisions concerning vicarious liability were no doubt motivated by a desire to do justice, but have left the law in an unclear and unprincipled state.’
Employer’s liability is a section of Tort Law that deals with the liability, employers’ have for occupational injuries to their employees arising from their negligence.
Discuss. (focus on particular recent developments, lister v hesley halland its successors such as Viasystems, which considered the position of borrowed servants. Secondly it had to explain
the particular concept of “justice” which may have motivated these
decisions. Thirdly it had to explain whether the law was now either
unclear or unprincipled. For instance it might be thought unclear whether
Lister applies only to intentional wrongdoing by an employee and whether
it has blurred the distinction between vicarious and primary liability.
Candidates are entitled to agree or disagree with the quotation or to agree
in part and disagree in part. What is important is that the argument is
logically presented and is based on an accurate representation of the
This is a vicarious criminal liability doctrine.
Corporate officers should be held criminally responsible for the actions of low-level employee's actions.
College essay writing service
Why does the law allow principals to be vicariously liable for agents and employees? How does the scope of liability for actions of agents differ from that of employees? Perform legal research and locate one case in which the principal was liable for the action of an agent or employee. Briefly summarize the facts and holding of the case. Make a suggestion for how other businesses could avoid liability in similar situations.
Do You want us to complete a custom paper for you based on the above instructions? Give us your preferred deadline by clicking on the ORDER NOW button below. Welcome to TermPaperChampions – The Home of Homework Help!
The same point can be made with respect to kitsch literature:it provides vicarious experience for the insensitive with fargreater immediacy than serious fiction can hope to do. And EddieGuest and the Indian Love Lyrics are more poetic than T. S. Eliotand Shakespeare.
principle of vicarious liability is the best compromise which could
have been reached between the needs of tort victims for compensation
and the freedom of businesses to operate without excessive burdens.
In The Laws of War and Peace, Grotius was responding in part to Desiderius Erasmus' In Praise of Folly, which presented an impassioned and influential statement of Renaissance Catholic pacifism.